Support political projects

March 2026: The national referendum on Sunday, March 8, 2026, offers conservative-minded Swiss citizens several opportunities to oppose the dismantling of traditional Switzerland. With three proposals, the Swiss people can reject the development of a society that is hostile to freedom and families and subject to total surveillance.

• NO to individual taxation! Individual taxation is already being put to the vote, and signatures for a referendum on this issue have also been collected as part of the citizens' forum. The campaign for the vote is being driven forward by slogans such as “Abolish the marriage penalty!” This sounds as if it were promoting traditional marriage. However, this is by no means the case. Individual taxation is by no means a conservative instrument. If it is accepted, it will only drive an additional wedge between married couples because it disregards the unity of marriage in yet another political act (tax collection). It also turns the marriage penalty into a family penalty. Parents who decide to look after their children themselves instead of pursuing dual incomes and sending their children to nurseries and daycare centers will be significantly worse off in terms of taxation. For more information, visit: https://www.ig3plus.ch/individualbesteuerung.html
• YES to the halving initiative! With the halving initiative, conservative circles are attempting to finally correct the Swiss TV's politically left-leaning course. It is no secret that the vast majority of Swiss journalists are politically left-wing and are becoming increasingly so. Zurich journalism professor Vinzenz Wyss presented the facts in a 2024 study by the ZHAW. It is no wonder that a state-affiliated, compulsorily financed mass medium such as the SRG frequently engages in SVP bashing and the expansion of a woke Switzerland. If the Swiss people halve the revenues of this large left-wing corporation, it will send a clear signal against the left-wing journalism of the champagne socialists.
• YES to the cash initiative! Even the Federal Council is convinced that cash belongs in the Federal Constitution. Internationally, banks and national banks are exerting a lot of pressure to force citizens to use exclusively electronic payment methods. This approach is highly prone to errors (power outages, hackers) and makes it possible to monitor citizens' financial activities completely. The coronavirus pandemic has shown that the state is quick to throw citizens' freedoms overboard. Financial freedom is a fundamental right that greatly protects the privacy of the individual.

February 2026: In many countries, efforts are being made to prosecute political abuses and drastic damage caused by coronavirus and vaccination policies. Of course, most politically powerful figures, as well as a large number of prosecutors and judges, are resisting taking responsibility. The German Bundestag's Enquete Commission, for example, resembles a shadow theater rather than a genuine attempt to uncover the truth. However, in the US, Japan, and other countries, critical reviews are being pursued at the highest levels in some cases. In Switzerland, of course, little is reported about such developments in the mainstream media. It is thanks to the Action "Alliance for a Free Switzerland" that the issue is not being forgotten in our country either. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxA_fuPREYM

August–September 2025: Support for the “Families Against Individual Taxation” committee in the “Referendum Against Individual Taxation” (online and by collecting signatures on the street). The Federal Council and Parliament want to impose a new tax system on families. This “individual taxation” punishes traditional families fiscally. Married couples who look after their children themselves have to pay more tax as single-income households, while high-earning dual-income households are spared. This is unfair! Married couples who decide to raise their children themselves should not be penalized by the tax system. The fact that a nominally conservative Federal Council wants to burden families with higher taxes is not in keeping with traditional Switzerland. https://www.ig3plus.ch/individualbesteuerung.html.

Mobilization for a NO vote in the referendum on the E-ID Act on September 28, 2025.

May 2025: There is strong public opposition from left-wing autonomous groups to the participation of Israeli singer Yuval Raphael in the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest in Basel. They publicly promise to prevent Israel from performing at the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest. A strong police presence prevents the anti-Semitic protests from gaining momentum and allows pro-Israel rallies to take place in front of Basel Cathedral and St. Jakob Stadium. The left-wing protests are nipped in the bud. The Israeli singer performs undisturbed and wins second place.

The Corona Symposium, which the Citizens' Forum 2024 actively supported, takes place again in May 25 (flyer). Competent speakers shed light on the scandal of Corona policy and insist on a public review.

November 2024: 66% of the Basel population votes in favor of supporting the ESC with 35 million Swiss francs in taxpayer money.

March 2024: Since the end of 2021, the WHO has been working on a treaty to be better prepared for pandemics in the future. This treaty (CA+) and the International Health Regulations (IHR) are to be adopted in Geneva at the end of May and then submitted to the governments of the 194 WHO member states for ratification.

The WHO's claim to global leadership has long provoked critical resistance in Swiss politics. In 2023, a whole series of motions were submitted to the National Council (Schläpfer, Gafner, Glarner, Reimann, Friedli, Grüter, etc.) to shed light on the matter and prepare appropriate defensive measures against the undemocratic influence of the WHO on Switzerland.

One of the most important questions raised by these motions is:

Will the WHO pandemic treaty be put to a vote by Parliament and the Swiss people?

Or does the Federal Council claim the sole right to approve the treaty, which is binding under international law? As is usual in such cases, the Federal Council's answers are evasive. They are sugarcoating and obscuring the issue. And they solemnly assert that Switzerland is not at risk of losing its sovereignty as a result of the WHO treaties. “Switzerland will continue to have sovereignty over its own health policy and measures in the event of a pandemic,” the FOPH asserts in a statement dated December 21, 2023.

The former FOPH deputy director, Nora Kronig, is also keeping a low profile. In an interview with the NZZ regarding the WHO IHR, she said: “The amendments to the International Health Regulations are rather minor and technical in nature, so a parliamentary decision is not necessarily required.” (NZZ 05.12.2023, p. 9). In view of the hundreds of substantial amendments proposed by the WHO in 46 pages to supplement the IHR, one can only shake one's head at Kronig's whitewashing (or is it more than that?). The WHO's claim to be able to rule globally in a self-defined pandemic is defined extensively in both the CA+ and the IHR.

This is reason enough to take a close look at the undemocratic intentions of the WHO. Details can be found in the blog article dated February 3, 2024.

Focused and dynamic, https://abfschweiz.ch/ is committed to fighting against an emerging health dictatorship by the undemocratic WHO & Co.